News

Police dismiss speculation about second autopsy

Jamaica's deputy police commissioner Mark Shields on Wednesday denied media reports that a second autopsy would be performed on the body of Bob Woolmer. "I can assure you there is no post mortem, there is no planned second post mortem," Shields was quote

Cricinfo staff
27-Mar-2007


Mark Shields: confident first autopsy was accurate © AFP
Jamaica's deputy police commissioner Mark Shields on Wednesday denied media reports that a second autopsy would be performed on the body of Bob Woolmer. "I can assure you there is no post mortem, there is no planned second post mortem," Shields was quoted by AFP.
He added that any post mortem would only be announced in consultation with the Kingston coroner's office. "If there was any question of a second post mortem it would be something that I would discuss with him and announce," Shields said.
Several newspapers carried claims that the first autopsy was not thorough, and some have gone as far as suggesting that there were enough inconsistencies to indicate that Woolmer might not have been murdered at all, but could have died after falling heavily against a bathroom sink.
The forensic pathologist, Ere Seshiah, initally claimed that the results of the first autopsy had been "inconclusive", and Shields conceded that this might become an issue in the event of a trial. "The jury may want a second post-mortem and if we arrest someone this week and charge them, the defence counsel will want a second."
Shields also said the quality of footage taken from the CCTV cameras in the hotel was better than expected. "There were some people in the footage that I'd met in the week after the murder of Bob Woolmer that I could clearly and easily identify," Shields said.
His priority was to locate and interview as many witnesses as possible. "We are working from the inside out - it is those that we know were close to Bob Woolmer, were associates of Bob Woolmer, people who were on the same floor or close to him from the time he returned to the hotel until the time he was murdered."
He also said that it was highly likely that people had left traces of DNA at the crime scene. "The reason we're taking DNA samples from everybody is to exclude them," he said.